While my music video looks very professional and effective, I believe my ancillary tasks such as the digipac aren't as good looking.
Firstly I believe that my poster does combine well with the music video, since my entire design is of a screenshot directly from the music video as an action shot that advertises a live performance of the band. I have seen this done before and it is an effective method of drawing somebody's attention to the poster- any fans would recognize the artist and want to find out more about the venue, and anyone else could look at this and see that that band looks exciting and go watch them. I kept to my own Media Convention when creating the poster by using the same font style that I had used on my digipac, so that the two connect with one another and people can recognize the band from that associated type-face. I have tried to use the rule of thirds for this poster, with the attention drawn to the far right 1/3 of the poster where Tony is. The rest of the space (empty Looking space) has the bright green light, which I believe works effectively and links back to that Prog rock feel.
My digipac however doesn't connect as much to my music video. For this I used a gradient colour of black and red for the backgrounds, with each CD case having the gradient end in different corners. However the colour combination of red and black doesn't fit with the video which contains colours of green and orange from the lighting rigs. On one page I have created the Lime Shark logo pictured on their website www.limeshark.com/ which adds to the professional feeling that you have an official Cd digipac album from the band. I also have included screenshots from my music video on one page: my motivation for this was from my digipac research, where in two of the album booklets I had there were photographs from the live shows of the band. In the same kind of format, I have added screenshots from my music video. If this was a real album I could insert photos taken directly at a concert but instead these screenshots will do instead as 'bonus content' for the audience to look at.
Throughout the entire research, planning and production stages of my music video and ancillary tasks I have used many different media technologies to assist me. During my initial research and information stage the internet was a very useful source of intelligence. I used different sites to look more deeply into the history of the music video and key terms such as Goodwin's theory of music videos and Laura Mulvey's Male Gaze theory. I also used it to brush up on my knowledge of camera shots, edits and angles, as well as getting ideas from watching as many different genres and varieties of music videos as possible, so I could use them for inspiration and get a good idea of what typical Media Conventions are in similar music videos.
Websites such as YouTube and Google Videos were a great help for this, since nearly all music artists have their own channel where you can watch all their music videos, a very useful means for me to get a view on how Rock music is portrayed. Other software I used during the creation of my digipac and poster was Adobe Photoshop. I have used previous art software programs such as PaintShop Pro 7 so understanding Photoshop didn't take long and I quickly got to grips with how it worked, so I could begin on my digipac. Its wide range of tools, colours, effects and imaging meant that I had a lot of freedom of what to put onto my blank digipac template. Using the layer system where each component has it's own layer so you can edit it without changing anything else on the page, which I used to put everything in it's places to give me the final designs for my digipac and poster.
For my music video, I used a high-definition camera on a tripod to film the band (a Panasonic HVX200). I filmed around an hour and 40 minutes of film, which I then uploaded to the Mac computer onto the program Final Cut Pro, a very professional editing software system which many TV companies are know to use. The program places all of your filming parts (from whenever you press the record button) individually on the left-hand side, so you can look through all the film and find the pieces you want. For your music videos, we were told to film the performance at least 4 times from different perspectives. My filming involved filming the band from a longshot, the singer from 2 mid and up-close shots, the drummer from 2 mid shots, the bassist from mid and close-up angles, the drummer and bassist from a high-angle and then filming the entire performance wile doing some elaborators crane shots past each band member with me moving the camera.
Once I uploaded all the footage on the computer, I had to use one of the shots as the 'base layer', the footage on the bottom line which the screen would always cut back too if there was nothing above it. I used a stationary close-up shot of the lead singer for this, and then put every other shots above it so they would be shown, with regular cuts back to this base layer. I found out that the editing takes a very long time to do, since you have to select the portion of footage you want, cut and move it into place and then sync it with the music since they are properly miming instruments and singing. If I had any narrative clips the length of time editing would be less, since these shots wouldn't need to be properly placed to be in sync with the music. Once every shot was in place, I used filters and effects to improve quality and make it more interesting to view. Overall, Final Cut Pro is complicated and was daunting to use for the first time, but as soon as I had got the hang of the interface the editing went quickly and I could browse through the software, expanding my understanding of the technology and seeing how I could improve my video at the same time.
During this evaluation stage I have used my knowledge of Final Cut Pro and the the Mac computer to create a short spoken evaluation video, added onto this written evaluation. The 4 minute-long video comprises of my actual music video, with me speaking over the top using the Mac's built-in speaker/recorder with the audio added on Final Cut Pro. This shows that I haven't just written an evaluation, but also used my knowledge of media technologies to make this work less text and more visual and audio based.
From my audience feedback, I have understood that I have an effective, professional-looking video but slightly weaker ancillary tasks. My family and friends have seen the video, and have given very positive feedback. They regard it as 'well put together', with a wide variety of camera angles and shots. A comment on the beat pleased me: 'It is clear that you have listened to the beat and adjusted the amount of cuts to the speed of the music' so I know that I have edited it correctly like a conventional music video, where the cuts are in time with the musical beat. However, while regarding it as a good performance video, they did mention the absence of any narrative clips which 'spoil an otherwise high-quality music video'. This is important user feedback which I can use, so that I understand that while a pure performance video is good, it is also very common and your audience like it when you give that extra effort with a joint performance-narrative video which can relate and reach their emotions.
For my digipac, people felt that they were rushed and I could have spent longer on refining the colouring, style and overall design of the digipac. They liked how I had designed the Lime Shark logo myself, and it's addition 'shows how you are linking this work directly back to the band'. However, they did identify that I had used my previous digipac research as influence for the pictures I included, displaying how my audience can compare this digipac to existing ones so they can see the similarities and difference and see how effectively it is to real products. My poster design received more positive feedback, with people saying how 'the captured photo looks like it's during a live concert' and again I have clearly looked at similar rock posters for ideas on what to create.
Overall, my user feedback has been very useful in identifying which areas of my work are high-quality and which aren't and could do with further improvement. Using these I can gradually change my work so that it perfectly matches their requirements and appeals to my target audience.